Qu mixer survey

Forums Forums Qu Forums Qu general discussions Qu mixer survey

This topic contains 20 replies, has 15 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of trueevan trueevan 3 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #57910
    Profile photo of Nicola A&H
    Nicola A&H
    Keymaster

    Do you own a Qu mixer? We have put together a quick survey on mixer technology to gather your feedback. It only takes a few minutes and if you submit before the 8th of September you will be in with a chance to win a ME-1 personal mixer!
    https://community.allen-heath.com/survey

    #57917
    Profile photo of joel77
    joel77
    Participant

    I took the survey. Figure it’s a good way for Allen & Heath to get an idea of what features we like/dislike/don’t care about and what we want to see them implement. There might be some great new features coming, we’ll see.

    Thanks A&H for seeking out our ideas and thoughts.

    #57920
    Profile photo of dpdan
    dpdan
    Participant

    one of the questions was how likely we would or would not use a QU customizable control app.

    I don’t even know what that is.

    #57931
    Profile photo of Nicola A&H
    Nicola A&H
    Keymaster

    @dpdan

    That question refers to Qu-Control.

    #57934
    Profile photo of dpdan
    dpdan
    Participant

    I never knew it existed….. very cool though.
    New things like this should be introduced to existing registered users of QU products via email.

    Thank you Niccola!

    #57936
    Profile photo of debzdoodle
    debzdoodle
    Participant

    This is just one of things I love about A&H and I will continue to be a loyal customer. Just completed the survey.
    Thank you A&H

    #57954
    Profile photo of PEJ
    PEJ
    Participant

    I am blown away by my Qu-24 mixer and did take the survey. I am amazed that the apps are so powerful, fast and free. It seems A&H are looking for input on future directions. The survey did not provide a write-in section so I’ll be bold and add my requests here.
    1. Channel selection on 18 multitrack playback rather than forcing it to ch1 to ch18.
    2. Access to 14 or more soft keys through the apps to my QU24. Access to the maximum of any feature via the app where there is no horsepower limitation to the Qu-24 (or 16).
    3. More choices on the Qu-Control app such as arm/record/stop so I do not have to dedicate three physical soft keys just to QuControl them. Or allow me to assign arm/record /stop to soft keys 11 to 14 so I do not consume physical buttons. See number 2 above. Other Qu-controls… Shutdown, and ??? drawing a blank since no iDevice at home.
    4. Android version of Qu-Control.
    5. Next gen Qu-16 and Qu-24 powerful enough to do 32 channels.
    6. Next Gen Qu. All mono mix outputs with option to join for stereo. I know you have that loud and clear 😉.
    7 Finally, a Qu-SB-8 xlr channel for $400 to really compete in low end product market or drop the expected price of the Qu-SB which looks like CDN$1600 to CDN$2000. Once you hook someone on an inexpensive Qu mixer, they will be back for more. Once they buy the competition low end model, you have lost them for life… It comes down to an App familiarity issue. Low price=zero profit but = ton of sales and tons of customers. IMHO.

    Keep up the great quality product. Thanks.

    #57956
    Profile photo of GCumbee
    GCumbee
    Participant

    How about a GLD survey?

    #57957
    Profile photo of Showtime
    Showtime
    Participant

    +1 gld survey

    #57961
    Profile photo of Dags
    Dags
    Participant

    Thanks for the opportunity to provide feedback and contribute to future upgrade ideas.

    Dags

    #57964
    Profile photo of Scott
    Scott
    Participant

    +1 for GLD survey.

    Do you think there would be a good market for a Qu 8 ? Smaller yet, for singer/songwriter, duo, trio, and good for the home recordist. I am a sound provider for everything from outdoor multi-band festivals to small duet/solo artist gigs. The Qu 16 works well for small bands, but something smaller would be nice too. I use a Zed for my really small shows, but going digital there would be nice too.

    One of the things that I like best about my Qu and GLD gear is that they can all share the same dSnake boxes. Redundancy and interchangeability makes these 2 product lines work well together when going out to do various sized shows.

    #57967
    Profile photo of hobsound
    hobsound
    Participant

    I agree on the system interoperability statement.
    I love the fact that I can use my 2 AB168’s and AR84 with either my Qu-16, QU-SB, or GLD-80.
    That’s why I have stayed in the A&H family.

    #57979
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous

    I never knew it existed….. very cool though.
    New things like this should be introduced to existing registered users of QU products via email.

    Really interesting
    I never knew that you could use this with iPad either?
    How did I miss that?

    #57980
    Profile photo of DanZ
    DanZ
    Participant

    Would love a ADAT to DSNAKE cheap converter, as I have a very good 8 preamp with ADAT out rack

    #57982
    Profile photo of [XAP]Bob
    [XAP]Bob
    Participant

    ADAT -> expander
    ADAT as a solo 8, or ADAT as top 8 with an expander for another 1/2/???
    Maybe multiADAT?

    ADAT out?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.