[woutersnoeiParticipant]

+1 for being able to delete recordings from within the SQ interface. Especially just after recording. I often start the recording too early, especially during rehearsals, so many of the – unnamed – tracks are just a bit of silence or babbling, and like to be able to cancel and throw away immediately.

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

+1 on this old feature request, hopefully bumping it up. OSC support would be awesome!

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

just adding a thought; what if the (possible) extra matrix buses could be configured in the Bus Config section, and an extra matrix would simply cost a group or aux? Would there then be enough processing spots in the core without having to rebuild and test it all (or at least not as intensively)? I have had some cases where I would have been very happy with a few extra matrices and didn’t use all my group/auxes..

cheers & thanks!
Wouter

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

Thanks Keith, good to know that you have at least tried :-). An alternative idea; would it be possible to make the global tempo controllable via a direct midi message (nrpn or controller) to set the actual tempo value? I tried doing it with “virtually” tapping a soft button, but it seems very unstable especially with network MIDI. If we could set it directly via one simple message that would already make life a lot easier.. (at least my life, which is highly based on tempo synced delays 😉 )

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

I’m sorry, Muchou, but I don’t agree with you there. Apart from the lack of this RTA thing the software of A&H is way better than that of the X32, and in fact one of the main reasons I chose it. Aside from that; if you have Facebook you can jointje SQ users group and see the live preview Keith did of the new 1.5 firmware and notice that their implementation of RTA is also way more flexible than that of the competition. So it took a while, but then you get something really good. Also mentioned in the presentation was that the firmware is in its final testing stages and may come out soon. Enjoy!

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

I have the same (or at least a similar) issue, but not on Catalina; 10.14.6.

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

Hi, Let me chime in as a lightly-experienced iOS developer; yes it is possible for an iPad app to keep the device awake, saving a lot of swipes and clicks for doing what Alex says (including setting back to normal settings which one is bound to forget..). For example TomTom (iPhone) does this. It can also be user defined, and is really not hard to program! I’m surprised it isn’t included already in the mixpad app..

cheers,
Wouter

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

+1

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

+1 on the flashing led

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

Reading back on this thread it seems that A&H is actually already losing (potential?) customers over this…

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

I agree with paullorenz on this; apart from the fact that unnecessary resources are used by the method described, it is a workaround that requires extra time. Of course it can be programmed ahead, but one of the strengths of these mixers is how fast you can work with them. Everything is well-designed and effective, so it is actually possible to “improvise” with them. Which in some cases is needed. In that respect I find it strange that such a basic thing requires a workaround, while it could be implemented with a simple, intuitive balance control (the screen real-estate is already there; where normally the pan pot is) that would require virtually no extra cpu power and actually improve routing flexibility a lot.. (and perhaps compensate a bit for the limited amount of matrix buses 😉 )

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

Ha, yes I thought if that too, later :-). Still a bit of a workaround, but it would indeed work in this case.

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

Yet another use case: in a set I needed to feed the L and R speakers with different eq settings, because they were a bit – ahem – old. Turns out that is really hard to do, with a bunch of stereo input channels and some effect returns in the mix the only option would be to split the mainLR over two mono matrix buses. But that’s not possible, or did I not look well enough? This is the flexibility I’m talking about. Ideally there would be a balance pot for stereo channels mono buses (aux, matrix), which would regulate how much of the L and R is fed to the bus. Please?

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

+1 for more matrix buses, even if it’s *one* more that’s already very welcome..

cheers & thanks,
Wouter

[woutersnoeiParticipant]

+1

[Author]

Posts