[WolfgangParticipant]

a button that deletes all matrix points in the I/O, i. e. sets them to zero.
but only for the selected matrix.

I hope this is better understood?

[WolfgangParticipant]

in iLive there was the possibility to write only certain functions in a scene. I used this especially for effectscenes and was very happy with it.
of course you can also use recall filters, but as soon as you change the number of AUX, you have to adjust the recall filters to the changed situation.
I find this tedious and also quite problematic if you forget to adapt in hectic situations.
so I would like to have a scene management for FX (which also includes routing) independent of the rest of the system.

[WolfgangParticipant]

+1

[WolfgangParticipant]

+1

[WolfgangParticipant]

hello.
I always solve this with a mono-matrix. I send the TB mic to the matrix, where the call function via talkback-button is active.
you would have to send the matrix to the ext. input instead of the microphone input.
I also send this matrix to the ME-1, so that the musician only hears my talkback when I press the button

if you only route the inputsignal, this call function is bypassed and you always hear the direct microphone signal.

[WolfgangParticipant]

“– Store scope (decide what do you want to store in a scene).”
yes! That’s exactly what I want since dLive is on the market.
i could use that for effect scenes, so i don’t have to rework all the scenes if the number of auxes is changed or new functions are added.
I have already written that, but apparently there are only a few colleagues who could use it.
I would appreciate it very much

[WolfgangParticipant]

yes, also here the call of the “Mighty” greatly increases the level.
I think it would be better if the level was only raised moderately for now.

[WolfgangParticipant]

we’ve seen all the videos perfectly.

asking the multiple-choice questions we felt a little unnecessarily and then after a while of jokingly pressing false statements… to find out that you could have won a ME500 😉

at the webinar we would have been interested in the operation of the interface. that was clearly missed out.

[WolfgangParticipant]

Hello, I also saw the black cross for a moment, but I didn’t know when it appeared. I think it was in the scene window.

my system:
DM32 – S3000 – M-MADI, M-Dante, IP8 and DX168

[WolfgangParticipant]

hello Ben,

I do not find the Firmware Reference Guide on the homepage. the search function did not yield any results either.
where can you find it?

EDIT:
the Firmware Reference Guide can be found here:
http://www.allen-heath.com/dlive-s-class/dlive-documents/

[WolfgangParticipant]

I have also been working with ME-1 for several months now and would like to have an editor for the preparation.

An editor would be really great, with whom you can also intervene online in configurations. Sometimes it is necessary to change something quickly, e. g. when a guest musician is added and this channel is not used in the ME-1. You have to run to the stage and adjust the ME-1 quickly.

so: +1 also from me

[WolfgangParticipant]

I know what you mean.
but it also depends on the job you do. the dLive is very flexible in its use, which I have also taken care of very small events.
for example last weekend a very well paid half-playback-show for 60 important guests. so I had to bring a controller for the small PA. in iLive, this could be solved with onboard equipment.

it’s not about outsourcing controllers to the console in general. I hope you understand now what I mean.

[WolfgangParticipant]

yes, as I had already written above, adding matrices is not fitting the solution!
in the matrix so far there are unfortunately only very simple filter options, this is not comparable to the “Speaker Matrix” from iLive!

but it would be enough if you had better filtering possibilities in the outputs.

another idea could be to call up an 8-band PEQ as a GEQ-model 😉

[WolfgangParticipant]

@AJ:
if you connect two surfaces with a mixrack, 64 channels remain for each console.
you can divide up to 64 inputs on two consoles, depending on the configuration even more, it doesn’t have to be exactly symmetrical.
then each console has completely independent processing per channel.

[WolfgangParticipant]

Thank you for the new firmware!
Again many ideas were realized, which I had also recommended!
great!
we will be a good team 😉

[Author]

Posts