Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
2020/11/01 at 12:23 am #960372018/07/20 at 12:09 pm #72836
Yes, you can record directly on your PC all the tracks of the QU-24 is separate wav files
A simple USB cable is ok. like this one : https://www.amazon.com/AmazonBasics-USB-2-0-Cable-Male/dp/B00NH11KIK
Actually, you can only record the tracks OR play the recorded tracks. not play and record.
Regards,
Dan
2018/05/16 at 1:29 pm #71060For the second solution, if the FX2 send is post fader, we still have the same problem, no?
If it is prefader, it is not easy … when a musician want more volume, i need to readjust again the reverb FX2 send together…Strange no one had this idea, to set the fx postfader to the current mix
2018/04/17 at 8:15 am #70464Yes specs are only marketing today. They also says that the max db spl is obtained when protections are removed (not possible in normal operation), maybe few seconds more and the speaker is dead 🙂
freq range is -10db and not -3db
So finally we don’t know that much the truth…
And the most important… how it will sound.
I had a HK speaker. Good specs, but so unpleasant to ear
Yamaha DSR is not so so pleasant in treble . a bit horny harshy sound for voice singer
I have some RCF speakers that are really pleasant to ear2018/04/16 at 10:05 pm #70458Yes for drums the DSR is very good, but I don’t why, the vocals are not pleasant at high level
Will buy the DZR if I can sell the DSR 🙂Do you know the EV ETX12?
Do you know the KV2 AUDIO EX12 ? (another level)2018/04/16 at 10:22 am #70432Yes. I have the Yamaha DSR 112. They are serious speaker and very powerful. Unfortunately, not very pleasant sound when the volume is high. The trebles kills the ears, and lack of bass. I was not able to really EQ them so the singer does not heart my ear 🙂
The new DZR series seems to have better transducers and go lower in bass
1150 eur for the DZR10 seems to be the price, but I will go for the DZR12, as 21 Kgs is still possible for me 🙂
The Dante model is 100€ more. That’s why I am asking myself this question2018/04/16 at 9:30 am #70425I mean, avoiding DAC from QU then ADC from the speaker conversion to hope to get better sound with the smallest possible latency
If not, why would you use Dante in a speaker ?
2018/03/08 at 6:47 pm #69453mmm… as the preamp has only ADAT OUT , then I don’t think the QU clock will depend on the adat clock
So this converter need to have a ADAT IN and a BNC clock OUT 🙂2018/03/08 at 6:39 pm #69452I think we can share the clock within the ADAT stream
2018/03/08 at 9:01 am #69445Yes they are well priced, but since I already have very good preamps and converters, i would prefer to use them and buy a little converter for 100€ (that does not exists yet 🙂 )
Or maybe add an adat input to their AR84 🙂2018/03/06 at 10:23 am #69388Maybe A&H can create one,
Or a simple DSNAKE to Analog I/O box, without preamps, so it cost less than actual boxes
2018/03/05 at 4:18 pm #69366The router has DHCP activated
The QU-PAC always get the reserved IP address 192.168.1.100
The phone got 101…Strange.. I have reboutted the router and now it is working…
Will see next time on live situation….
By the way, the RTA on the EQ page is the big plus of the APP
A&H? Why you not inspire 🙂
2018/03/05 at 1:12 pm #69357Hello David,
I tried your app on my android phone (nexus 6P, Android 8.1.0)
I am connecting ok to the router
The mixer IP is 192.168.1.100, but I can’t connect with your Mixing Station Qu (Could not connect: failed to connect to …. EHOSTUNREACH..)
The Search button is an infinite Searching…Do you have an idea what this can be?
Regards,
Dan
2017/11/30 at 10:14 am #66606I also want this
In fact, I need the 2.
One to see the input after gain if it is well tuned and one to see the actual mix after all and fader, and compare tracks visually, to see what tracks is ” louder ” and mix with the eyes
Don’t know why no digital mixers comes with the 2 meters available2017/09/25 at 8:32 am #65415Great !
-
AuthorPosts