Forums › Forums › SQ Forums › SQ feature suggestions › HPF (High-Pass Filter) on Mix Busses
- This topic has 72 replies, 43 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by nottooloud.
-
AuthorPosts
-
2019/01/08 at 1:45 am #81274GCumbeeParticipant
Quite possibly THE most requested feature but with the least interest from the factory. It is frustrating.
2019/02/06 at 11:39 pm #81797nottooloudParticipantThere’s an HP knob and switch on the front panel. They don’t work on buses.
I consider this a bug.
2019/02/07 at 12:06 am #81798DavidCoParticipantIf it works as intended, it isn’t a bug.
DC
2019/02/07 at 9:00 pm #81816nottooloudParticipantIf it works as intended, it isn’t a bug.
It doesn’t work at all, for no apparent reason.
I get that companies leave off high end features in order to drive customers upward in their lines. This one makes no sense, though. People on A&H’s upscale mixers are more likely to be interfacing with systems that have accessible DSP. It’s the punters in the trenches that need HPF on our outputs.
2019/03/08 at 8:55 am #82496ydParticipant+1 for HPF on mix buses.
Thank’s2019/03/11 at 9:37 pm #82577DiMAParticipantWow I didn’t know such simple feature is not there yet, and we’re getting SQ5..
Definitely +12019/03/11 at 11:13 pm #82578AnonymousInactiveI get that companies leave off high end features in order to drive customers upward in their lines. This one makes no sense, though. People on A&H’s upscale mixers are more likely to be interfacing with systems that have accessible DSP. It’s the punters in the trenches that need HPF on our outputs.
2019/03/12 at 12:03 am #82580GCumbeeParticipantI’ve never understood this obvious omission.
2019/03/12 at 3:17 pm #82597BarryjamParticipantI don’t recall A&H ever even responding to this request in the forums, which seems like another omission that that I cannot understand.
2019/03/12 at 4:09 pm #82601GCumbeeParticipantBarryjam: I really think these guys have never ran a sound system before.
2019/03/12 at 5:57 pm #82602SteffenRParticipantI don’t recall A&H ever even responding to this request in the forums, which seems like another omission that that I cannot understand.
they stated many times that they read nearly all posts
2019/04/10 at 9:29 am #83266Valentyn LParticipant+1 for HPF/LPF on Auxmixes
2019/04/10 at 2:53 pm #83281KeithJ A&HModeratorHi All,
We do monitor feature requests on this forum and through other channels as @steffenromeiss said, and whilst we don’t always respond publicly, we regularly discuss common requests internally.
Regarding HPF on outputs, there are architectural reasons why this isn’t trivial to implement, and hasn’t been addressed so far, if we do find a solution however, development will be prioritised against other feature requests as we know you’re screaming out for it!
Thanks,
Keith.2019/04/10 at 3:15 pm #83283BarryjamParticipantKeith,
Thank you for the reply. Your response about architectural reasons makes so much more sense to me than than user beliefs that you ignore users or attempt to force users into more expensive products.
This does beg the question as to why you haven’t shared this exact same response much earlier. I encourage you to let us in on the status of requests that we’ve “screamed out for.”
2019/04/10 at 7:28 pm #83286GCumbeeParticipant2 observations. One. It was around from long ago on GLD. Not sure about iLive. Assuming it was so it’s not something new.
Two. I’m simple minded about things and try to think as logically as I can. For me st least it just does not seem logical that the same PEQ with HPF on the input channel could not used on the output in place of what’s there. Aren’t they basically the same architecture?
If you can convince me there is a logical and legit reason with specifics then I think folks will understand.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.