Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #100351
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    I’d like explain my view on the SQ-SB/PAC.
    What is main thing for every musician? Does not matter it a symphonic orchestra or small amateur’s group 2…5 persons. Of course – quality of sound!
    The best quality of sound is analog. But today we need many addons to analog sound to make modern sound: compressors, dynamic EQ, echo, delay, and other FX-devices. And they are from metal and are very heavy – but we (small groups) need a portability and light weight… That is reason why we need a digital mixer.
    But a digital mixer on DSP chips with 24 bit / 48 kHz has not a good quality of sound (comparing to analog sound) because:
    – By processing on 24/48 some coloration (overtones) of sound is lost;
    – By DSP-chips processing a phase of signals is not coherent on input and output of mixer – it is loss of clarity, non-musical distortions, muddy sound;
    A mixer on FPGA-chip 24/96 kHz has more precise and amenity by AD/DA conversions and processing of sound:
    – 24/96 kHz has smaller latency;
    – Phase coherent (all mixers with FPGA-chip inside are phase coherent devices = dLive, Avantis, SQ-serie);
    – More overtones are living in sound.
    About quantity of inputs/outputs
    For small groups 16 physical inputs and 8 outputs will be enough in many situations. Architecture FPGA with 32 channels inside will allow to make parallel processing of channels in some reasons. Slink – allow to add more inputs/outputs if it will be needed by additional one or two stage boxes.
    About “faderless controlling”.
    Today every musician has a gadget – Android, Apple, Windows are platforms for control application for the faderless mixer. And the gadget technology leaps forward very quick. I think, it is no sense to install a gadget inside of the mixer – it will be non-modern in short time. Wi-Fi router and Touchscreen has to be non-installed in the mixer.
    About cards.
    Yes, of course. Dante, Waves…. It is a future. The less AD/DA conversions of a sound then better for the sound.
    Footswitch – yes, of course. Not a lot of small groups has a sound’s engineer/operator and footswitch will be very useful in many reasons: rever-delay on/off, mute a group, change a scene for next one.
    So, short to say – for me an optimal construction of digital mixer would be – “cut off” of all faders and buttons from SQ-5.

    #100276
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Yes, the dlive cdm32 is splendiferous… except one thing – price is too high 🙂

    #100272
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Yes, it could be DX168 but with combi XLR/TRS inputs and with place for one card (Dante or Waves… will be very useful).

    #100257
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    My proposal for structure of SQ-SB is very easy:
    – take SQ-5 and cutoff all faders, buttons and display;
    – from backside view of SQ-5 nothing changes except XLR inputs – they have to be Combi XLR/TRS
    That is it. Software is the same. Cards are the same.
    Form factor is stage box with 19” rack volumes

    Dear All! Let’s discuss of the structure of SQ-SB rack mixer – it will helps to Allen&Heath to understand what an optimal structure has to be… but don’t forget about costs and end price.

    #100255
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Yes, it would be great to have SQ-SB or SQ-PAC for small groups too.

    #98211
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    SQ-SB and SQ-PAC for small bands +1000

    #97513
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    +1000

    #97162
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Dear A&H,

    Could you tell me when comes for sell SQ-SB or SQ-PAC?

    Best regards

    #96512
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Yes, it would be great! Only our activity can attract attention of A&H to this point! Please, be active!

    #96340
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Hey Allen&Heath! Did you see New Midas Heritage-D Air
    Maybe your answer will be SQ-SB or SQ-PAC ?!!
    We are waiting…

    #96228
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Hey Folks,
    Maybe somebody has information about plans of A&H for SQ-SB and SQ-PAC – please, mention it here. It is allow to make this topic more active.
    Without our activity A&H thinks that it is not interesting for us…
    QU-serie is practically closed for improvement – nothing will happend with it.
    We have to ask about improvement of SQ-serie in direction “low cost”.

    #96115
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Hi Maw92,
    Look on motu 1248…
    About SQ-SB – I think, it will be more profitable for A&H only to remove from SQ-5 all faders… The rest of SQ-5 will be without changes. Maybe only TRS/XLR inputs will be changed (on my wish:-)

    #96068
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    Yes, Hugh, you are right – control application for QU-SB could be much better but a snake cable for FOH (CAT5 or CAT6) to PC or Mac with Touch screen not a bad solution in this case.
    In any case I hope for SQ-SG our loving Allen&Heath has chance to make better control application.

    #96065
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    I mean SQ core 32 – configuration from outside like on QU-SB (QU-PAC) but inside configuration like SQ-7.

    #96064
    Profile photo of Alex_Petrov_59
    Alex_Petrov_59
    Participant

    I think the best variant of SQ-SB or SQ-PAC will be with the same configuration as has SQ-7 but without faders.
    But input sockets have to be as on QU-SB or Combi TRS/XLR in quantity 16/8

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 31 total)