[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

SQ-SB Please
SQ-PAC or similar product, planned?

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

I agree with you, Hugh, we should know 100% what we get – it should be better than MR 18 in all aspects. Especially in terms of sound quality, but regarding Wi-Fi, I think it would be better to have an external router … it will be more flexible. If someone needs a more reliable connection, then CAT5 is the best solution.

Dear LusterLights, thank you for your opinion. Let’s more ofter tell about it to A&H – I’m sure it helps!

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Dear Mfk0815,
I’m agree with you – the SQ-SB will be very useful and popular even A&H just cutoff faders from SQ5 desk ( and of course cutoff faders from the price). I’d like to get all plag-ins with the mixer too like its does Behringer/Midas.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Hi Hugh,
I’m totally agree with you:
“…
1)The hard cold truth is, other than it’s cosmetic appearance, A SQ5 placed on the stage floor in front of the performers that is totally controlled with an I-Pad and ignoring the SQ’s tactile controls would in essence be an SQsb.
…”

For people who like to have a little tactile controls it will be enought to sell SQ-PAC… I’m live during 3 years with MR18… I’ve understood that a mixing console with tactile control knobs is just a habit that is easy to get rid of … As easy as switching to a digital console from an analog one. (Maybe hard on begin but you cannot stop it more…) In addition, tactile control knobs are a source of additional damage due to wear. I would be happy with my MR18 but for studio works it has not so good quality of sound as SQ… So, I’m waiting for SQ-SB anyway:

(melody from ‘O sole mia)
It’s now or never
SQ-SB
Sell it me sooner
My Allen&Heath
Tomorrow will be too late (Political situation will be worse)
It’s now or never
SQ-SB

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Dear Mr. Keith,
Please, don’t forget about SQ-SB and SQ-PAC.
Keep it up.
Keep it up.
Keep it up.

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Dear Mr. Keith,
Thank you very much for the actual information on the creation of SQ-SB(PAC) and new hope that our dreams will come true. In order to somehow speed up the process of creating SQ-SB(PAC), maybe you will bring up for discussion some specific parameters and properties of the future product, and in the process of discussion useful ideas will arise that will improve this product to its serial production and ensure its commercial success? We are ready to help you!

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

I’m looking every day for very good news from Allen&Heath about SQ-Pac and/or SQ-SB testing… But nothing… Are somebody heard about it?

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Hello everybody,
Just to show the item in first page…
And I’d like to remind you be more active if you would like to get the SQ serie in form of a stage box or SQ-PAC.
Please, more discuss on the thema!
We have calculated price for future unit and we have approximately construction of the unit – are you agree with it?

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Added USB Record stick and grips

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Good idea, lets we doing visualisation of our dreams and they will come true!
My small improvement for SG-SB is here
(all things on the one side – in this case we can set the box in any place)
(Combi inputs XLR/TRS and a few Hz inputs are better for me – I don’t need DI-Boxes)

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Hugh,
one idea for you – ask A&H to improve AHM64 for your needs: to make it cheaper remove all inputs and outputs from the device, maybe add one more S-Link… and you will get brain-box of d-Live without I/O!

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

+100%

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

About potential price – I’d like to offer you more pleasant view on it… (I hope A&H makes the same or better, but not worse!)
According Sweetwater price list in USD you can calculate determinations for QU serie as following:
Qu-16 % down Qu-Pac % down QU-SB
1800 13,89 1550 38,89 1100

After extrapolation this formula on SQ serie we will get:
SQ-5 % down SQ-Pac % down SQ-SB
3200 13,89 2756 38,89 1956

So, for SQ-Pac=2756 USD, for SQ-SB=1956 USD… not bad. I like this reasonable price. Because inside of SQ serie a little other structure compare to CDN32 – less FX Buses, not free of charge Deep Procesing…

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Dear Hugh,
Maybe you would like to have not a simple stage box with SQ5 inside and S-Link for expansion possibility, and place for extention card (with expansion possibility)… but for me and, I think, for most small bands it would be quite enough. I need only one simple unit for all my mixing tasks, including IEM… Simple SQ-SB stage box with back side of SQ5 mixer but with XLR/TRS inputs would be for me optimal. Additional knobs, joysticks, monitor and other mechanical/electronical futures are not only source of additional breakages but more high price for the unit. Simple box – for simple mixing tasks builted like a tank.

[Alex_Petrov_59Participant]

Hey Folks,
Our loving Allen&Heath company wants to make for us very useful mixer in form of stage box with modern parameters… Let’s help it to do that.
What about inputs in form of combi XLR/TRS? And a few or all inputs with Hi-Z Ohms? (Would you like to save some money for DI-Boxes?)

Best wishes
Alex

[Author]

Posts