Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
2024/02/06 at 9:09 pm #119210
Yes indeed tourtelot, i do me :). Though i will have a couple of months before the tour, and i have a local guy i work for who is very well versed in Dante, so if i do go for it i’ll only do it if i have practised it a lot.
But really, i’d prefer all A&H.2024/02/06 at 7:26 pm #119204Thank you everyone for your replies.
I am used to running a show from 1 desk. My desk is usually not very far from the stage. And i use an iPAD a lot, often mixing standing up in front of the musicians, or sitting down at the front of the audience if its a sitdown mellow gig.
But these gigs i am asking about here are at much bigger venues, and so it seems the best option is that i must be at the traditional mix position far from the musicians, and so a monitor mixer is required.
My initial thoughts were like what Mike C and Brian are suggesting, an all A&H system. My only concern is if some venues (very posh big theatres) don’t want a cable running from FOH mix position to the stage.
If a venue has a quality ethernet cable (CAT6?) installed from stage to FOH mix position, maybe thats no more unreliable than an analogue snake?As i haven’t used Dante before i would also prefer not to have to learn it, but its very flexible, thanks for your input on Dante tourtelot and adethefade.
TOBI, why use Dante for virtual sound check? If am going for an all A&H
system won’t that do the job?2024/01/10 at 5:23 am #118278Ah thats good Tobi!!
What would it be called then? Static surround? Stereo plus?
I do appreciate the complexity of true surround, and i would imagine a separate mixer and engineer just for surround would be ideal.2024/01/09 at 7:23 pm #118270Thanks guys. All of the sources to be sent in this gig to the surround speakers will be stereo.
That is delay returns and a stereo drone track.
So i think with an aux or matrix send to the surround speakers would do fine, as i won’t be panning during the gig,
just fading in and out these sources. Not a lot of fader movement with these sources.2024/01/09 at 7:18 pm #118269I just need to send a drone play back track to the surround speakers, and 1 delay used by 1 or 2 vocalists.
I don’t see why using Groups or Auxes into the 1 or 2 matrices and 1 spare stereo aux won’t work.2024/01/09 at 12:22 pm #118250Thanks, got a reply from A&H. They say SQ will do fine for my application. So for now i’ll stay with SQ and make it work.
Love the sound of DLive with the touch screen X/Y surround gizmo.2024/01/09 at 10:45 am #118246Thanks very much jyradelix.
The theatre holds 2000 and has a Dolby Atmos Surround Sound System installed.
Maybe i need to go on a DLive course and hire one for the show.
What does DLive do with Surround that Avantis/SQ doesnt?But i don’t think so, as the surround mixing will be quite simple being the delay of 1 vocal going and some pre recorded drones.
I can imagine Sq’s or Avantis’s Matrices doing a good job at that?2024/01/09 at 10:31 am #118245What is an example of a surround desk?
The theatre the shows will be at has a Dolby Atmos Surround Sound System
installed.2018/08/30 at 5:37 pm #78189MJCElectronics old thread, but I have just started using DCA’s and I really like your EBV on one fader and ONLY V fader idea.
I do this manually, so this is going to be great.
QUESTION.
So by moving the DCA fader, does that that mean that the inputs assigned to it, their send values to the aux busses (mix 1 – 7) are changed in proportion too?
This would be great.
Thanks Tom. -
AuthorPosts