Forum Replies Created
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Thank you Wolfgang, that’s interesting, and very true about the console. I checked the official specifications and there are differences shown there too (though I’m aware these can’t always be relied on for direct comparison):
Mic/Line Inputs | SQ | DX168
Input Sensitivity | -60 to +0dBu | -60 to +15dBu
Switchable Pad. | -20dB | -20dB Active PAD
Analogue Gain | 0dB to +60dB, 1dB steps | +5 to +60dB, 1dB steps
Max Input Level. | +30dBu | +30dBu (PAD in)
Input Impedance. | >5kΩ | >4kΩ (Pad out), >10kΩ (Pad in)
THD+N Unity gain 0dB | 0.002% -92dBu | not listed
THD+N Mid gain +30dB | 0.003% -91dBu | not listed
Mic EIN | not listed | -127dB with 150Ω source
Phantom Power | +48V (+3V / -2V) | +48V
Very true Steffen. I’m fully aware and almost pointed that out in my response actually. I just used ST1 as a common reference because I don’t currently have cables on hand to switch between DX168 1/2 and SQ-5 local 1/2 from the same playback source.
Not completely scientific or definitive by any stretch, but for what it’s worth:
Y-cable to split source feed between two stereo inputs on an SQ-5. Used a test tone to match the input levels and then with stereo music playback blind switched between:
DX168 inputs 1/2 via SLink and SQ-5 local ST1 line in:
I chose the DX168 as my favourite every time. There seems to be something about it; a definition that presents details in the music and vocals more clearly – added sparkle.
SQ-5 local inputs 1/2 and SQ-5 local ST1 line in:
These two are much closer and in fact I chose the ST1 line in, but I’d be hard pressed to say there’s much of a difference here.
Neither disappoints, but I’d say the DX168 has some extra magic over the local inputs. I’d love to hear others thoughts on this and I stand by to be shot down by A&H telling me they’re actually identical! 🙂
Please create an account to get started.