Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #70123
    Profile photo of Jamie
    Jamie
    Participant

    Thank you Wolfgang, that’s interesting, and very true about the console. I checked the official specifications and there are differences shown there too (though I’m aware these can’t always be relied on for direct comparison):

    
    Mic/Line Inputs        | SQ                        | DX168
    Input Sensitivity      |  -60 to +0dBu             |  -60 to +15dBu
    Switchable Pad.        |  -20dB                    |  -20dB Active PAD
    Analogue Gain          |  0dB to +60dB, 1dB steps  |  +5 to +60dB, 1dB steps
    Max Input Level.       |  +30dBu                   |  +30dBu (PAD in)
    Input Impedance.       |  >5kΩ                     |  >4kΩ (Pad out), >10kΩ (Pad in)
    THD+N Unity gain 0dB   |  0.002% -92dBu            |  not listed
    THD+N Mid gain +30dB   |  0.003% -91dBu            |  not listed
    Mic EIN                |  not listed               |  -127dB with 150Ω source
    Phantom Power          |  +48V (+3V / -2V)         |  +48V
    
    #70106
    Profile photo of Jamie
    Jamie
    Participant

    Very true Steffen. I’m fully aware and almost pointed that out in my response actually. I just used ST1 as a common reference because I don’t currently have cables on hand to switch between DX168 1/2 and SQ-5 local 1/2 from the same playback source.

    #70104
    Profile photo of Jamie
    Jamie
    Participant

    Not completely scientific or definitive by any stretch, but for what it’s worth:

    Y-cable to split source feed between two stereo inputs on an SQ-5. Used a test tone to match the input levels and then with stereo music playback blind switched between:

    DX168 inputs 1/2 via SLink and SQ-5 local ST1 line in:
    I chose the DX168 as my favourite every time. There seems to be something about it; a definition that presents details in the music and vocals more clearly – added sparkle.

    SQ-5 local inputs 1/2 and SQ-5 local ST1 line in:
    These two are much closer and in fact I chose the ST1 line in, but I’d be hard pressed to say there’s much of a difference here.

    Neither disappoints, but I’d say the DX168 has some extra magic over the local inputs. I’d love to hear others thoughts on this and I stand by to be shot down by A&H telling me they’re actually identical! 🙂

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)