Does USB-2 have enough bandwidth for 32 track DAW recording?

Forums Forums SQ Forums SQ general discussions Does USB-2 have enough bandwidth for 32 track DAW recording?

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #82570
    Profile photo of KenMKenM
    Participant

    Hi, Getting ready for a live recording concert and wanted to check if the USB-2 is sufficient a pipeline for 32 channels. I am not concerned about latency, just getting the tracks recorded. I had no problem with my QU24, but want to make sure it will work at 96kHz with my SQ5. I am also curious why A&H sticks with USB-2, probably enough bandwidth.

    Most of my recordings are 16 tracks or less so I use the SQ drive in tandem with the DAW for safety.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #82579
    Profile photo of Anonymous
    Inactive

    is the USB-2 sufficient a pipeline for 32 channels at 96K?

    On the QU32 I have always increased the computer latency to the max as only wanted to capture.
    32 channels at 96K ?
    Thats a very good question!
    Whom can answer this question?

    #82583
    Profile photo of jmolejmole
    Participant

    32 tracks over USB is fine, there is enough bandwidth.

    But I don’t think you can use the SQ drive at the same time.

    #82584
    Profile photo of KenMKenM
    Participant

    Using the both drives at the same time is important to me. Anyone can confirm if both USB’s can be used at same time? I typically use 16 tracks if that helps.

    #82585
    Profile photo of KenMKenM
    Participant

    I found the answer in the A&H knowledge base, Both USB’s can’t be use simultaneously: “SQ-Drive Playback/Recording (stereo or multitrack) + Playback/Recording from USB B (streaming from DAW) not supported simultaneously”.

    This brings up the question of which would be more reliable? I am using the Samsung T5 500GB SSD for SQ multitrack. Logic suggests that the SQ drive would be more reliable if only 16 tracks are needed, Using a DAW adds more complexity in software and hardware.

    Love to hear anyone’s thoughts.

    #82588
    Profile photo of Mfk0815Mfk0815
    Participant

    I have tried the SQ Drive with some thumb drives and sometimes it works, sometimes not (using an early firmware version, 1.1 or so). In those days also the USB-B was not really reliable, I had some issues with my Windows Laptops and PCs. But today the USB-B is reliable and I use it as backup for my Dante card. Dante is for me the best choice because i can choose between 96 and 48 kHz and can record also all 48 input channels which is not possible with the USB-B (32) or SQ Drive (16).

    #82600
    Profile photo of DeanDean
    Participant

    I have done test recordings with my new SQ5. None have been more than 10 minutes so far but it is working error free. I am also using a Samsung 500GB T5. This applies to USB-B and SQ drive both.

    The computer I used with the USB-B tests was a $200 Dell laptop… so it appears that the computer itself is not taxed too heavily (as is also seen monitoring Task Manager on the computer) though I’m sure a fast drive is essential.

    #82603
    Profile photo of KenMKenM
    Participant

    I managed to get lucky and found a Demo Dante card at Sweetwater for $600. When I record a live concert I get one shot at it. Having a backup is essential for me.

    #83206
    Profile photo of Rob-SpenceRob-Spence
    Participant

    With Dante you can route to two computers running DVS. When I record live, I send the input direct outs to Dante outs.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.