Does USB-2 have enough bandwidth for 32 track DAW recording?

Forums Forums SQ Forums SQ general discussions Does USB-2 have enough bandwidth for 32 track DAW recording?

This topic contains 8 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Rob-Spence Rob-Spence 5 months, 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #82570
    Profile photo of KenM
    KenM
    Participant

    Hi, Getting ready for a live recording concert and wanted to check if the USB-2 is sufficient a pipeline for 32 channels. I am not concerned about latency, just getting the tracks recorded. I had no problem with my QU24, but want to make sure it will work at 96kHz with my SQ5. I am also curious why A&H sticks with USB-2, probably enough bandwidth.

    Most of my recordings are 16 tracks or less so I use the SQ drive in tandem with the DAW for safety.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #82579
    Profile photo of xyz
    xyz
    Participant

    is the USB-2 sufficient a pipeline for 32 channels at 96K?

    On the QU32 I have always increased the computer latency to the max as only wanted to capture.
    32 channels at 96K ?
    Thats a very good question!
    Whom can answer this question?

    #82583
    Profile photo of jmole
    jmole
    Participant

    32 tracks over USB is fine, there is enough bandwidth.

    But I don’t think you can use the SQ drive at the same time.

    #82584
    Profile photo of KenM
    KenM
    Participant

    Using the both drives at the same time is important to me. Anyone can confirm if both USB’s can be used at same time? I typically use 16 tracks if that helps.

    #82585
    Profile photo of KenM
    KenM
    Participant

    I found the answer in the A&H knowledge base, Both USB’s can’t be use simultaneously: “SQ-Drive Playback/Recording (stereo or multitrack) + Playback/Recording from USB B (streaming from DAW) not supported simultaneously”.

    This brings up the question of which would be more reliable? I am using the Samsung T5 500GB SSD for SQ multitrack. Logic suggests that the SQ drive would be more reliable if only 16 tracks are needed, Using a DAW adds more complexity in software and hardware.

    Love to hear anyone’s thoughts.

    #82588
    Profile photo of Mfk0815
    Mfk0815
    Participant

    I have tried the SQ Drive with some thumb drives and sometimes it works, sometimes not (using an early firmware version, 1.1 or so). In those days also the USB-B was not really reliable, I had some issues with my Windows Laptops and PCs. But today the USB-B is reliable and I use it as backup for my Dante card. Dante is for me the best choice because i can choose between 96 and 48 kHz and can record also all 48 input channels which is not possible with the USB-B (32) or SQ Drive (16).

    #82600
    Profile photo of Dean
    Dean
    Participant

    I have done test recordings with my new SQ5. None have been more than 10 minutes so far but it is working error free. I am also using a Samsung 500GB T5. This applies to USB-B and SQ drive both.

    The computer I used with the USB-B tests was a $200 Dell laptop… so it appears that the computer itself is not taxed too heavily (as is also seen monitoring Task Manager on the computer) though I’m sure a fast drive is essential.

    #82603
    Profile photo of KenM
    KenM
    Participant

    I managed to get lucky and found a Demo Dante card at Sweetwater for $600. When I record a live concert I get one shot at it. Having a backup is essential for me.

    #83206
    Profile photo of Rob-Spence
    Rob-Spence
    Participant

    With Dante you can route to two computers running DVS. When I record live, I send the input direct outs to Dante outs.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.