[ton-juanParticipant]

we are aware of this technical vagueness 😉 thanks for the article nevertheless.
measuring the speakers after processing showed the need for narrower filters.

these fill speakers are on another fuse than the concert system and thus not time controlled (on/off procedure). If we knew this “behaviour” before rebuilding the power distribution, we would have perhaps counted it in. These speakers are sometimes in use without the concert system, so another difficulty there.

We are changing the complete PA system soonish, time delayed output unmute will hopefully be possible from the system amp.

AHM-64 is controlled via an IP-1.

[ton-juanParticipant]

cool, thanks for the reply.

yes, there even is an IP-1 installed @ FOH. We are still thinking a bit ‘in the box’ at the moment. This solution will work. (We have put the IP-1 there for a reason :facepalm)
but an additional function for choosing which channel of L/R is used or a Panner would still be nice.

Still remains:
Another wish from our side would be to have narrower Q’s available in the speaker processing EQ (and perhaps also input/Zones EQ). The datasheet from our wedge manufacturer, for example, calls for a Q=14 to remove a speaker resonance at a specific frequency, the narrowest Q AHM-64 offers is 6.

And another thing: One DT168 is connected to the AHM-64 for additional outputs to outfills and barfills. It takes a rather long time for the DT168 to connect to the AHM-64 (>30s). And the connection is then confirmed two times with a fullscale bang from the speakers. Is this a Dante problem?

[Author]

Posts