[basmeijerParticipant]

That’s me too. Awaiting SQ consoles with less inputs and outputs.
Reason simple: less space, weight, compact. Just a few inputs to connect someting like outboard gear, link another desk from a guest engineer, a talkback mike at FOH plus a few outputs like for same outboard gear, L/R, direct hookup to delayed speakers and such.
For me like 6 in, 6 out tops works for all occasions. But could even live with 4 in+out. The rest would just be completely redundant and still unused when the console reaches its retirement age.

[basmeijerParticipant]

Hi Allen & Heath community! (post #1)

Count us in for the SQ rack. We would love to have one.
This is because we regularly offer our sound services in locations where there is no place for a proper FOH position in certain clubs, In that case a rack model would offer much more setup speed and flexibility. We now own a rack mixer from another brand for these purposes but long for the SQ because of the fantastic sound features they offer.

Of course a true companion would be a SQ series console that is dedicated to be used with this rack mixer(S).
This is because this console would not need all the mixing power and input of the SQ rack mixer, so that would be more economic I suppose.

A track count to mix and record up to 48 is mandatory. To be able to expand and record up to 64 would be great too, if possible technically.
Looking forward to any news about this!

[Author]

Posts