Dx4816 vs Dante aes67

Forums Forums Other A&H products Dx4816 vs Dante aes67

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Nicola A&H Nicola A&H 10 months, 1 week ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #113460
    Profile photo of Latham
    Latham
    Participant

    Hi All

    I would like to find out if there would be a audio quality benefit using the GX4816 over dante to the Avantis console.

    Reason being is that I would like to setp an Audio infrastructure using dante with the Axient Digital microphone systems to directly into the console using the Dante 64×64 card compared to running analog/AES into the GX4816 Preamp.

    #113467
    Profile photo of Nicola A&H
    Nicola A&H
    Keymaster

    Hi Latham,

    Have a look at this recent topic which discussed a similar question: https://community.allen-heath.com/forums/topic/dante-or-xlr-what-is-the-win-for-one-mic

    Latency differences are negligible if running Dante at the lowest latency setting. Arguably there is an advantage in keeping the signal digital rather than going through unnecessary DA/AD conversions. AES would have the same advantage, and ultimately lower latency than Dante, but you cannot send AES to the GX4816 preamps.
    As other users have suggested in the linked topic, it is primarily a question of convenience and preferred topology.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.