CQ 32 channel version(32t)

[Newtrik]

Dear, Allen & heath please release CQ (TOUCH) 32 CHANNEL VERSION WITH 24 MIC PREAMP AND 3 STEREO INPUT BIG 10 INCH TOUCH SCREEN, 12/14 AUX ALSO MORE USER BUTTON , 6/8 FX ENGINE, (IF POSSIBLE ALL OUTPUT WITH FIR FILTER SUPPORT) REALLY NEEDS THIS CONSOL BECAUSE SPACE AND PORTABILITY MOST IMPORTANT CQ IS MY FIRST CHOICE, GREAT EASY TO USE ALSO CQ IS PHYSICAL FADER LESS THAT’S IS PLUS POINT FOR ME. I LOVE FEATURES OF THIS CONSOL, PLEASE RELEASE 32CH VERSION

Love from INDIA

[AdamInAZ]

Please God Yes!! Or at least update the CQ 18 where it can add a digital snake with the ability to expand channel count like the QU series can do.

I would be ALL OVER this in either capacity!
CQ has so much goodness. I prefer it immensely over my aging QU.

Expandability is the only major drawback. Tell me there are plans in the works?🙏

[Dor Seidel Thom]

Thats the wrong forum. write in “CQ feature suggestions”

[KeithJ A&H]

*moved thread to CQ feature suggestions

[NM_1_5_6]

+1!!!

[Hugh]

The SQ5 has everything you are requiring and more. Please try to understand the hard reality of the CQ’s entry level limitations: The width of it’s XCIV core driven FPGA processing intentionally limits the I/O options to their internal I/Os. I have sucessfully deployed an SQ5 with a DX32 loaded with 8 Prime I/Os & 16 D-Live pres. I added a CQ20b to facilitate my one man show &/or small sized Bluegrass gigs. I had no illusions pursuant to any expectation of using my world class DX32 I/Os with the little CQ20b: it is what it is and does what I required quite well. The CQs & SQs are SR tools that need to be matched to the task at hand!
Hugh

[Tobi]

… 🙄

[Frenchie]

Hugh was mostly answering to AdmamInAz I believe.
Even if this is not the goal of this forum section, I see not problem expressing ideas for full new product as Newtrik did.
But Hugh answer to AdmamInAz ‘s reply make sense to me.
I am also pretty convicted that the CQ line as it is now will never receive any major update for any kind of expansion abilities.
I don’t see how it could be possible at hardware level.

[Tobi]

…

[Hugh]

Truth told I too would love to purchase an advanced “Mix on glass” desk accommodating expansion stage boxes and sufficient processing speed to deliver the best A&H deep plug-ins. My earlier post was emphasizing the fact that it is highly unlikely A&H will make any major alteration to the existing CQ line. The only prayer of the type of device the OP has requested is a totally new designed “mix on glass” desk that features SQ level I/Os and even better processing speed.
Hugh

[Author]

Posts