[DougParticipant]

Hi Mark

The easiest way to do your recording split would be to put a Dante card in the system

[DougParticipant]

Thankyou jggrooms removed all my 1.9 back up files from my seperate A&H folder to a stick uninstalled V1.9 again shut down re started downloaded the program again and it started! Have a virtual pint on me.

Now just need to buy some hair restorer!

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

quote:

---

Originally posted by dburris

Here’s what I would suggest:

Using the editor software create a sample show using the T112/iDr48 combination. Switch the editor to T80/iDr64 and read in the show file. It should show you exactly what the hardware would do.

iDr48/T-112/MADI/Dante

---

How do you do that without closing and re-starting editor?

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

Pin out is here https://iliveforum.allen-heath.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2079

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

Thing to do is follow the signal path which is easy to do on the T112. To begin with speak into the mic and look at the channel the mic is plugged into and do the lights indicate that the signal is getting in? If yes then look at the output channel and see if the lights light up when you talk into the mic. If yes then the signal is getting through the desk to the output.So now press OUTPUT on the surface and make sure your speakers are patch to the output sockets of the mixrack. If the signal doesn’t appear at the output you expect it to then you have to check the routing of that signal on the desk, is it routed to a group and that group isn’t routed to the output? Or is there a mute on somewhere you don’t know about? Press select on the mic channel then press Routing on the surface and it will tell you where its going

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

I’m assuming you want just one fader on the surface to control main out. Not sure if its possible in set up don’t have my surface to hand but a quick work around would be to gang the mains together in the mixrack ganging screen then you can re assign one of the main out strips on the surface to what ever you want

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

Direct out are exactly that, they effectively don’t get into the processing part of the channels so will miss DCA mutes etc. If i understand what he wants to do is to take the 16 individual channels in process them seperately then send the 16 staight out not summed. If you go into mixer config and remove all the busses you don’t use ie stereo and extra effects ones you may just be able to squeeze 20 auxes

This is on idr48

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

The output should be +10

You have checked that the outputs on the surface are correctly patched and that you haven’t used the inputs? Very easily done.

I would also route the mains through a stereo matrix then out through outputs on the surface, will give your cards input an easior time if your riding mains

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

You’ll find what you need in surface preferences

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

quote:

---

Fingers crossed I articulate this clearly:

When a scene is originally built, bank 1, fader 1 is Channel 1. Bank 2, fader 1 is Channel 13 (on my desk – the T80)

When inputs are deleted, instruments are changed, artists are removed, the “faders” are rearranged, but the channel numbers stick. This is because **I** am more comfortable assigning faders in the surface screen vs. copying/pasting info into a new fader. Ya, I gotta master that.

So now, let’s say my bank 1, fader 5 is channel 14 – which, logically, it should be channel 5 (OCD here, hang with me HAHA!) Your solution would be to copy/paste that channel into an unused channel buried down in bank 4 somewhere – which would change the channel number and THEN copy/paste it back into it’s desired position – finally correcting the channel number issue?

….and do I even need to worry about the channel numbers? Maybe I’m getting all spun up for no reason.

Peace! Always!

---

The question is how do the channel numbers/name relate to the patch sheet? In reality it doesn’t matter what the channel number is if the channel on the surface has a name. What does matter is what slot on the rack that channel refers to.

My idr is actually labelled 1-48 with sticky labels so if I want say a mic to appear at position 1 on bankA I just press ALt view and the channel/slotnumber is there so there is no room for confusion. In your example would you expect your fader 5 channel 14 to represent the source plugged into slot 5/a5 or slot 14/B6 ?

I agree sorting it out with editor would be the easiest way, although I would probably start from scratch!

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

To begin with I would consider having a show as opposed to a scene for each artist assuming that each artist works per week which will give you room to build the scenes in a logical order. With regards to organising channels I am assuming the slots on the racks are out of whack in which case just alter the slots on each preamp. If this is not the case then copy and paste the information to where you want it.

With regards to double patching create the missing channel in bank D and remove the links.

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

Yes same here in editor, seems they’ve changed implementation on editor, appears to be you choose a gang add add achanel then apply then then you can add as many as you want with no apparent problem and when you’ve finished you say yes thats what i want! Not updated sface and rack yet will do that in a couple of days in case there is a big bug they missed!

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

Saw it at Plasa yesterday, multiband comp is there as are 3or 4 Graphic eq’s

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

Tried tech support instead and in 2 hours they came back with this:

Hello Doug,

Pin 1 unused
Pin 2 unused
Pin 3 12V
Pin 4 12V
Shell ground

Note: A&H can not comment on or support the lamp you are proposing to use – only because we haven’t tested it. We have to test and document any third party unit in order to comment on its compatibility

Great service as usual

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[DougParticipant]

Great job thankyou very much any chance you could make it convert log files as well?

http://www.maltingsaudio.co.uk

[Author]

Posts