Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #109511
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    I dunno…looks like it will be a lot easier just to get an external DAC.

    #109509
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Yes,Thanks I saw/read that in the manual but thought maybe there had been updates.

    #108958
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Yes I doubt it also…So what’s the dang dealeo A&H?

    #108956
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Did you receive your SQ? If so now that you have the mixer is the stylus working?

    #108214
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Was that from Monoprice?

    #107829
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Thanks Nicola. You have affirmed what my reading and researching has led me to believe. Now I really, really want to hear one of these “desks”. In my room of course and compared to my older tech 48KHz desk.

    #107824
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Stumbled onto a YT video of Keith with Mitch Gallagher of Sweeetwater. Keith states the anti-aliasing is indeed higher and therefore the high freqs that we humans can hear are improved because of the 96KHz sampling. I hope this is just not marketing hype.

    #107754
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Thank you very much Keith. I am new around these parts and not an owner yet but I want to leap from 48 to 96k mixing. Did you happen to see my question in the SQ forum about 96k and mixer frequency response? And yes I am a geek.

    Eric

    #107725
    Profile photo of babadono
    babadono
    Participant

    Yes that’s the COOL thing about digital as opposed to analog almost everything is able to be saved and recalled later.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)