[advanceParticipant]

Hm, I don’t support the idea of a fine resolution button press. Just to be clear of my intention in the first post:

Just one knob for frequency, the frequency knob of the eq. (same goes for gain and q-knob)

You turn it very slow – smallest possible resolution of the underlaying eq algorithm
You turn it fast – bigger resolution, possible to sweep the range in one turn
Very simple.

That would be my wish, and also the behaviour of most other consoles I work with.

(I jump back an forth from midas pros and allen heath sqs, not the same price class of course, but with a few little software tweaks, the sq would feel so much more professional to me.)

[advanceParticipant]

I´m aware of the “gearing” or “acceleration” of the knobs. that´s a good thing. I´m complainig about the impossiblity to get the smallest resolution of 1hz with the freq eq knob. You can turn that knob as slow as you want, it´s always going to jump at least 5 or 7hz. An analogue pot on an analogue eq never jumps form one value to another, it´s impossible. That´s what I don´t understand or what does not make sense to me. I would be very nice if the “ballistics” (or whatever that is called) of the knobs could be a little more progressive, so that they allow to do the very fine movements at the very slow end.

I personally would prefer very much all knobs with the same ballistics, also the touch and turn. I tend to get used to one style on one console. If there are different from one knob to another, I tend to overshoot things on the faster ones. To me it´s more confusing and time consuming.

[advanceParticipant]

+1, yes would be much faster, without switching between tabs on that screen.

[advanceParticipant]

+1

[advanceParticipant]

+1 where did the old DCA spill post go? I already voted for that one. The old post had lots of thumbs up..
To me, this is still very important. I miss it every time I work with an sq.

[advanceParticipant]

I just got an sq survey mail. A lot of nice to have features are proposed to appear there. Mainly additional deep processing stuff. There was no way to point the hpf/lpf out there. Please don’t overlook that this time. It’s still essential to most of us.

[advanceParticipant]

you can do it by panning the mixbus your sending to. choose the bus, LR for instance, then press the “preference or patching” whatever it’s called icon on that mixbus. there you can pan the mixbus itself. i always do it that way when checking the connected speakers. a little clumsy, but it works. to be able to do it from the osc page, would be much more elegant and faster.

[advanceParticipant]

Yes, a switchable opiton in the peq for LF and HF, with bell, shelf and filter would be great. I don’t mind loosing this bands for that.

If its the same block and we would also get that on the inputs, that would be fantastic. The Lowpass/Highcut Filter is something I miss there heavily too.
I admit, doing crossovers in matrices is not the preferred way to go technically. But working on tight budgets, this is a very important feature to have. (and it’s possible with almost all the competitors desk in that price range).

[advanceParticipant]

tomos, that would be a good solution. by the way, that was already possible on the legacy ilive systems.

[advanceParticipant]

+1 this is really urgent! hpf AND lpf. also on the mtrx. I know so many people that do the crossover fro the pa on two mtrx on little gigs. it just not possible with an sq, that is intended to be used for little gigs. if i loose two bands on the peq, fine, if its an extra rack deep processing unit, fine. but i need it. now. i’m thinking about selling my sq5 because of this.

[Author]

Posts