Hmm, maybe its time to free yourself from the narrow mind that what A&H has implemented and you voted for the best solution ever, is also the best for others. Imagine that some of us, me too, will use scenes like a document, as you will use on your PC at home. You can load that document/scene into the processor/mixing console and manipulate that document. Then you want to simply save that changes with the same name on the same place in the storage. Thats why applications on your PC knows where the document is loaded from an also present that information to the user. If the document is modified in the application this might be shown too. You can delete or rewrite the whole content of the document, then name remains the same. So, why do you ever think that the same behaviour is not handy or needed on a mixing device? What are the great benefits to loose that information right after loading the scene? Why should it be not ok that A user can load a scene, modify some few parameters and is able to save it to the same place of the storage without the need to „remember“ that scene name and location outside of the console? And why you always think your way of thinking is the only right one?
