AVB Protocol

Forums Forums SQ Forums SQ feature suggestions AVB Protocol

This topic contains 4 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Steffen R Steffen R 4 days, 4 hours ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #87477
    Profile photo of ilya20008
    ilya20008
    Participant

    Hello!
    please consider the AVB Protocol option as an optional card.
    Today, this Protocol is quite relevant, and the leaders of the audio industry are already using this Protocol

    #87485
    Profile photo of Scott
    Scott
    Participant

    +1

    Would like this option on dLive as well.

    #87487
    Profile photo of Steffen R
    Steffen R
    Participant

    this is difficult at the moment
    too many problems between the vendors implementations…
    it will take some more time to solve the issues I guess

    #87488
    Profile photo of Nicola A&H
    Nicola A&H
    Keymaster

    Steffen is right in saying that cross-vendor interoperability is still an issue for AVB. In fact, I’ll go further in saying that there is no such thing as an ‘AVB protocol’. The AVB set of standards regards primarily hardware, and doesn’t dictate on what protocol to use. Most pro audio companies claiming to use AVB are in fact using a Layer 2 protocol known as IEEE1722, which makes use of some AVB standards. IEEE1722, in turn, doesn’t really specify a connection management layer nor a device discovery protocol, which explains the interoperability challenge.
    The MILAN initiative, supported by leading speaker manufacturers, promises to solve this, and at A&H we are watching such development with interest. If MILAN picks up in the industry, we will certainly consider developing an option card.

    #87491
    Profile photo of Steffen R
    Steffen R
    Participant

    Thanx Nicola

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.