Using FX channels improvements

Forums › Forums › GLD Forums › Archived GLD Discussions › Using FX channels improvements

This topic contains 3 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Chris93 Chris93 10 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 2013/09/24 at 2:00 pm #24010
    Profile photo of plevrier
    plevrier
    Participant

    Hi all,

    During shows I always name my FX channels. I have two issues which could be improved I think :

    * Naming : I can’t believe anybody uses two different names for input and output. So why are they not linked together?
    Now I have to type the same name twice… Not very important, but a little annoying and it would save time

    * Mix select. I would be great if you can use the MIX button on the FX return strip. Saves time and thinking.

    regards,
    Pascal

    GLD80 :-)

    2013/09/24 at 2:17 pm #34929
    Profile photo of eotsskleet
    eotsskleet
    Participant

    +1 for both suggestions! my words!

    GLD-80 / AR2412 / AR84 / Qu-16

    2013/09/24 at 3:13 pm #34932
    Profile photo of Pit Lenz
    Pit Lenz
    Participant

    The problem about assigning the FX ret Mix button as you propose is this:
    This button is already defined as Mix out to Auxes, Groups, Mains, just like any other Input’s Mix button. Changing this would break the logic behind the whole forward/backward mix assign procedure and make things more confusing.
    Other than that, I had the same thoughts before, too…..

    2013/09/24 at 3:23 pm #34934
    Profile photo of Chris93
    Chris93
    Participant

    I like the mix button the way it is, if I want some reverb on the delay return I press “mix” on the return and push up a reverb send.

    Chris

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

The forum ‘Archived GLD Discussions’ is closed to new topics and replies.