- This topic has 12 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
This is where I think you are wrong… I might be able to get sound into the IDR0 from the IDR48, but it doesn’t really matter, because a T surface will not work with the IDR0. Then the only option is to use the ethersound and buy a modular surface. That kind of money i don’t have
Thanx though. Regards, Tor
Vilddyr,
You can use a t-surface with the Idr-0. You have to use a M-ace card and It would need to be in port A rab-2 mounted into the expansion slot of ID-O. What you are wanting to do may not be possible with the IDR-O and a IDR-48 due to a limitation on the expansion slots. An Idr-0 Fited with a Rab-2 and an ace in slot a for Split, a waves card in slot B for waves processing.
Were I am not sure is I beleive at that point you would be limited to the editor control software to control the IDR-0. If you were to run a Ace card in slot a and ace in slot b of the rab-2, then you could get the split and also control from the T-surface. You would not have Waves ability in this set up.
Hang in there I am sure there is a way to do as you are looking for, you may just need a different roung. I dont see a lot of folks using the IDR-O on the forums much so getting response that will help may take some time.And please if someone reads and I am leading in the wrong direction…..Correct mE. [
]Do you currently have the equipment you listed? or is this a system you are looking to purchase and set up?
JEFF FLOWERS
VOLCANO ADUIO PRODUCTS
SHEPHERDSVILLE KY-USAYes, exactly the problem. So it seems this will not be possible, which is very disapointing. A system that prides itself on digital distribution and compatibility, and then a simple task like this can’t be solved… Only with the big modular systems, where the M-waves card can distribute audio with the seperate word clock. That is really too bad. I am pretty sure the answer will be a passive analog split in my remote snake system instead.
Too bad, must say i am quite puzzled as to why the waves card cannot act as digital split, since it can split endless times with a standard switch, and then as soon as it is for the IDR racks it needs a seperate word clock… Weird
quote:
Originally posted by vilddyrYes, exactly the problem. So it seems this will not be possible, which is very disapointing. A system that prides itself on digital distribution and compatibility, and then a simple task like this can’t be solved… Only with the big modular systems, where the M-waves card can distribute audio with the seperate word clock. That is really too bad. I am pretty sure the answer will be a passive analog split in my remote snake system instead.
Too bad, must say i am quite puzzled as to why the waves card cannot act as digital split, since it can split endless times with a standard switch, and then as soon as it is for the IDR racks it needs a seperate word clock… Weird
thats not an ilive issue its a waves issue. it was never designed for that
It wouldn’t have been totally outrageus to build that wordclock port into the waves card itself, since this must be a somewhat easy problem to see coming
quote:
Originally posted by tk2kquote:
Originally posted by vilddyrYes, exactly the problem. So it seems this will not be possible, which is very disapointing. A system that prides itself on digital distribution and compatibility, and then a simple task like this can’t be solved… Only with the big modular systems, where the M-waves card can distribute audio with the seperate word clock. That is really too bad. I am pretty sure the answer will be a passive analog split in my remote snake system instead.
Too bad, must say i am quite puzzled as to why the waves card cannot act as digital split, since it can split endless times with a standard switch, and then as soon as it is for the IDR racks it needs a seperate word clock… Weird
thats not an ilive issue its a waves issue. it was never designed for that
I use my 1 month old macbook, so it shouldn’t really be a problem with the processing. But fact is that DVS is way too slow for actual processing. I’m not looking to record, if so, why would I be talking about using waves
The iLive is good for most things, but not great for bus/master processing. I need proper dynamics, multiband and some decent processing on the master. EQ’s are fine, but the comp and limiter is useless for bus/master compression, so i need something more refined and solid. And the scene system in multirack, is much nicer to work with than setting it all up on the iLive.
- The forum ‘Archived iLive Discussions’ is closed to new topics and replies.
