Topic: T112 vs. 144 | Allen & Heath Digital Community

T112 vs. 144

This topic contains 10 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by msmelser 14 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

Author

Posts
2009/08/19 at 12:52 am #22113

Catalin_Gava
Participant

Hello everyone!

This is my first post on this forum.

In the near future I intend to buy a complete T112 system from Germany.
I just wanted to ask, for the record, what is the difference between iLive T and iLive 112/144/176. I just need a short comparison, for my curiosity, since I can not afford an iLive 144 system.

Thank you kindly. Cheers.

Neighbourhood Sound Terrorist

2009/08/19 at 5:28 am #24550

millst
Participant

the only difference between the 112 and 114 is the number of faders on the surface.

the stage racks can be the same though.

2009/08/19 at 8:15 am #24552

mumu
Participant

and modular

cheers
dave

allen&heath iLive-144 /idr 10 /

2009/08/20 at 12:07 pm #24569

tv7
Participant

iLive T-series control surfaces don’t have slots for expansion modules. iLive 80/122/144/176 has four of them.

– Kristian

2009/08/20 at 2:50 pm #24571

msmelser
Participant

From my experience running a show on an IDR10/ilive144 and then moving directly to another room and running on an IDR48/iliveT112, I’ve found the Ilive T to respond noticeably faster to commands from the surface, especially when going from menu to menu on the touch screen. Seems kind of weird to me since the T is the smaller, cheaper console. . .

2009/08/20 at 11:25 pm #24574

mumu
Participant

probably thats the reason

https://www.ilive-digital.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=900

cheers
dave

allen&heath iLive-144 /idr 10 /

2009/08/21 at 2:12 pm #24578

KB7981
Participant

quote:

Originally posted by msmelser

From my experience running a show on an IDR10/ilive144 and then moving directly to another room and running on an IDR48/iliveT112, I’ve found the Ilive T to respond noticeably faster to commands from the surface, especially when going from menu to menu on the touch screen. Seems kind of weird to me since the T is the smaller, cheaper console. . .

Are you making this comparison before or after you have initiallized the the touch screen menus.

Page 13 of reference manual issue 2 supplied with ilives with v1.41

Note: With the current version of firmware we recommend that you
initialise the TouchScreen pages immediately after powering up the
system. Press each key below the screen in turn to allow its page to appear. The ROUTING and FX pages can take up to 12 seconds to initialise. Once this is done for the first time subsequent access to these pages is instantaneous.

I don’t know if this holds true to the newest firmware though, we havn’t updated to 1.51 yet.

2009/08/21 at 5:57 pm #24580

papromike
Participant

Dont need to that anymore, unless that thing is older than V1.42 firmware.

2009/08/23 at 9:38 am #24584

Mr-B
Participant

The T series has different mic amps also, they should sound different though I have not had a chance to play with one yet. ACE could be a faster comms system I guess. The ability to load modules into the surface I would miss

2009/08/23 at 4:09 pm #24587

Catalin_Gava
Participant

From my point of view, it’s a little sad that you can’t load expansion modules, but for my needs, a iLive T112 with IDR48 is enough, I mean, you get a stagebox with 48 INs and on the surface I have some TRS IN’s, like I said, for me it’s enough. It’s a major candidate for my first digital mixer system. Thank you all for your opinions[]

Cheers

Catalin.

Neighbourhood Sound Terrorist

2009/08/26 at 4:29 pm #24598

msmelser
Participant

Both the ilive T and ilive that I’ve been using are running 1.43. I suppose it could just be a variation in processor speeds.
Author

Posts