Reply To: Sample rate

Forums Forums Qu Forums Qu feature suggestions Sample rate Reply To: Sample rate

#47142
Profile photo of GCumbee
GCumbee
Participant

We have been fighting this battle for 20+ years now. I was pushed in the 90’s to record at 48K. Then in 2000’s to 96 and 192. I fought it hard. We always had to come back down to 44.1/16bit for CD and conversion was always and still is an issue.

I had studio clients in mid 2000’s that made the decision to just stick with tracking and mixing at 44.1/16. Some 44.1/24. It seemed bit conversion was less damaging than sample rate. It would not have bothered me if AH had chosen 44.1 but then some would not have been happy with that. You can’t win with this.