Profile photo of Stix


Originally posted by vilddyr

eehhhh… 96Khz would be = half latency on all processing in the desk

I know this is off topic but anyone care to explain this? 96K converters would be running at twice the sampling rate of 48K but how is the actual processing time halved? Won’t there be twice the amount of data for the DSP to now have to deal with?
If total input to output system latency is the combined time for A>D,DSP,D/A then how does just changing the sampling rate to 96K halve the processing time taken? As I see it sample rate and processing time are not directly proportional to each other.
Hopefully someone here can explain.


Richard Howey
Audio Dynamite Ltd
Dual M-Dante/DVS, 17″MBP/Logic 9/Custom Mackie Control