2533

#33383
Profile photo of SteffenR
SteffenR
Participant

quote:


Originally posted by millst

That is true about the filters, but the inter-modulation introduced by 96k makes the rest of the signal sound worse.
Some interesting analysis and some test files to try on your 96k desks here:
http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html#toc_1ch

The iLive sounds great as it is, increasing the sampling rate won’t make it sound better.


Monty speaks about 192 kHz. And he speaks about music distribution.

96kHz in a live sound console would make sense, because latency issues,
possibly more accurate filters in high frequencies with lesser effort.
The lowered latency would be the biggest benefit to the current iLive system.

SRV-AVB
R-72, iDR-16, xDR-16, Dante