• Well regardless if I use cat5 or xlr, I’m going to max out the Qu PAC with same number of inputs. So that’s a wash.

    Regardless, isn’t a digital solution usually better than analog (assuming the intended project is fairly simple like what I’m trying to do)?

    What I forgot to mention is that there is already Cat5 cables to the rooms. So the mon…[Read more]

  • Well regardless if I use cat5 or xlr, I’m. Going to max out the Qu PAC with same number of inputs. So that’s a wash.

    Regardless, isn’t a digital solution usually better than analog (assuming the intended project is fairly simple like what I’m trying to do)?

    What I forgot to mention is that there is already Cat5 cables to the rooms. So the mon…[Read more]

  • You guys are awesome. Sorry for all the noobie questions.

    1. Yes I’m planning on using the 9 mic inputs in the main church (all vocals) to go to the second hall and out to speakers in the second hall at the same time the same input is going out to the main church. It seems an AR84 can do that. I will run a cat 5 from Qu Pac in main church to AR…[Read more]

  • Hello all,

    I have a Qu Pac in our church that is working fine. I want to send the audio from nine microphones into both LR speakers of the Qu Pac in the main church and another remote audio rack in a hall about 75 feet away that will be connected to its own separate speakers.

    Is it better to do this with an AR 84 or a AR168 or a second Qu Pac?…[Read more]

  • Rem became a registered member 3 months, 1 week ago