Qu-16 vs AB168 Preamp Comparison

Forums Forums Qu Forums Qu general discussions Qu-16 vs AB168 Preamp Comparison

Tagged: 

This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Fab Fab 4 hours, 49 minutes ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68925
    Profile photo of DJ Swell
    DJ Swell
    Participant

    Sorry if this has already been answered. I was wondering if any of you have had experience with both the Qu-16 and AB168 Digital stage box to compare the preamps in both?

    Last week I added a AB168 to my Qu-16 and I was surprised how much more headroom it appeared to have over the Qu-16 Preamps. It almost was so noticeable that I almost would say that I would prefer using the AB168 even when it wasn’t necessary. So That is my question, Have any of you Tested the local qu-16 preamps compared to the AB168 Preamps? Have you noticed a difference? IF so what was your mileage?

    Thanks in advance!!

    #69182
    Profile photo of ShantyMan
    ShantyMan
    Participant

    i think the reasen was that in the ab168 was extra hardware preamps.
    in my tests i think that is the point to use the ab168 for not so loud dynamic mikes
    we love that feature

    #69184
    Profile photo of Fab
    Fab
    Participant

    I just have the qu-sb+ar0804 (but interrested in the ab168) and I found these 2 pdf .. (1:from ab168 pdf / 2:from qu-sb pdf)

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.